In general, Andreas' commented that the organization and structure of the CPJ could be improved. The current layout didn't feel comfortable to read through because it feels too compact at times, while other times the amount of white space overwhelms the text. Weekly progress in terms of research & experiments could also be better reflected in the journal. So far Andreas said he found our in-person consultations more useful to keep track of my progress. It was an eye-opener for me because I realized other lecturers, peers, and even future Aimee who would be looking at the journal will probably have a hard time making sense of the process because it tends to jump around between research, case study, reflection, ideas, class comments etc.

At this time my CPJ format was on google docs so some comments might not be applicable for the website, but they are still useful pointers to keep in mind. For my next steps I will aim to craft my journal properly so that the narratives flows from week to week. I will also use the next few weeks to explore better structures for my CPJ and fill in the gaps in the research process, and as a personal goal for my final CPJ, I aim to make it more personalized and fun :-)